|
Go
|
New
|
Find
|
Notify
|
Tools
|
Reply
|
|
'my dogs have a keener sense of smell because their noses are larger in comparison to their body size.'
Good to hear you can outrun your dog as you have longer legs than it does, or hear better than a mouse as you have bigger ears see better than an eagle as you have bigger eyes. I guess until you quit you will never know. Your dog doesn't smoke either. Your looking pretty stupid now don't you gkayser? Dear Know it all, I fear your Dementia is progressing rather rapidly, your posts are becoming so silly. No, I can not outrun my dogs. But; if I had four legs, I might be able to do so. You may not have noticed(Dementia is so sad),dogs have four legs. I have never seen an eagle or a mouse that was as large as I am;but,if there are such critters,I would not be surprised if their eyes and ears were larger than mine. I do not think that I am the one looking pretty stupid. We ARE praying for you and your worsening Dementia! |
|||
|
I should regret this; but, I could not resist.
This is the perfect spot on this forum for 'Know it all'. After all, his posts are very,very taxing.  Merry Christmas to all. |
||||
|
Like most former smokers who were transformed into aggressive antismokers, his own antismoking indoctrination is presently trying to fight off his own nature (the biochemical networks of his cells) signalling him at all levels and through multitude of channels to go back and start smoking again for his own health (possibly to halt the rising darkness of dementia, hinted by the simple-mindedness and mechanical vapidity of his posts). The antismoking indoctrination having taken root in his unfortunate brain, is being cornered and brought to the verge of defeat by his natural defensive forces seeking back the medicine that works, the sacred tobacco plant. The antismoking parasite is now taking its last stand by externalizing and projecting his own natural defenses onto other smokers, allowing the parasite to recruit his ego to its side, making him believe that it is him fighting us, the other smokers, while in fact it is the parasitic antismoking indoctrination implanted into his brain fighting his own natural self-defenses. There are handful of similarly delirious victims of antismoking parasite over in the alt.smokers newsgroup, howling and shrieking at "smokers" (at their own natural self-defenses) every day, all day long, illustrating different stages of this dementia (check, for example posts of some poor fellow former smoker signing as "=> Vox Populi" , who is in the final, very sad stage of this delirium).
Merry Christmas from me and my family. This message has been edited. Last edited by: nightlight, |
||||
|
So tell me Gkayser, the size of you determines the effectiveness of your sensory organs? Is that what your saying? So tall people have worse hearing, eyesight, feel, smell, taste etc?
Interesting, I look forward to reading the high priest nightlight's research paper on that gem. Now why no comment here about sensory loss with over-exposure to stimuli? IE, hearing loss when exposed to noise or loss of sense of smell when constantly exposed to smoke. Isn't that what we were talking about? But you had to create a new thread to distance yourself from the ridiculous remarks you made there. Merry Christmas and a brilliant new year in 2007 everyone. Remember to put the fire out before you go to bed tonight. |
||||
|
Hey Nightlight, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection From you first link in your last post on this thread that wasn’t from that font of fact, Google Groups. PS, I didn’t bother reading google groups, you can do better than that can’t you? Oh hang on, it was the only link that wasn’t to google groups! Next you will be linking to forces! |
||||
|
The google groups posts (e.g. on biochemical networks) I linked to are my own posts which contain further explanation and references to published literature on the concept indicated concisely above. They are meant for information to other fellow smokers, not to aid or amplify your own public airing of your scrambled innards. I have no interest in the latter. A help from a psychiatrist or a dementia specialist would be more useful for your problems than embarrassing yourself in public, anyway. |
||||
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by I know it all:
So tell me Gkayser, the size of you determines the effectiveness of your sensory organs? Is that what your saying? So tall people have worse hearing, eyesight, feel, smell, taste etc? Interesting, I look forward to reading the high priest nightlight's research paper on that gem. Now why no comment here about sensory loss with over-exposure to stimuli? IE, hearing loss when exposed to noise or loss of sense of smell when constantly exposed to smoke. QUOTE] Dear Know it all, Dementia is so very,very sad!My statement was:"in comparison to their body size". Your comprehension seems to have slipped rather badly(Dementia is not reversible,unfortunately). Have you never seen an owl;big eyes for a smallish bird? Big eyes"in comparison to their body size". No comment on stimuli was deemed necessary. If over exposure to stimuli caused hearing loss or loss of sense of smell;why are all musicians not deaf or all chefs suffering from loss of a sense of smell? Lots of noise in music and lots of(carcinogenic) smoke in a kitchen. We ARE praying for you to find peace in your demented state of mind. |
||||
|
The sacred medicinal plant, tobacco, would stop further neurodegeneration and might even reverse it some. His problem is that his ego has been infested by the antismoking indoctrination parasite, hence he is imagining that it is now him fighting us, while in fact it is his natural self-defenses fighting this indoctrination. He is simply publicly struggling not to begin smoking again (which is what his cellular biochemical networks are signalling him to do in order to stop further biochemical meltdown). This message has been edited. Last edited by: nightlight, |
||||
|
These days most loud musicians were hearing protection when they perform. Deafness is an ocupational hazard of music. From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abs...us&list_uids=2609103
The reference to chefs is funny, the most prevalent exposure for them is steam. from http://www.entnet.org/healthinfo/topics/smell_taste.cfm
Have you ever seen those big stainless hood things over the cook tops in commercial kitchens? They suck out the fumes from the stove flames as well as the steam. You may find it is a OH&S requirement to have them in a commercial kitchen. Wood and charcoal stoves normally have a flue to take the smoke outside. Hopefully there isn't much tobacco smoke in commercial kitchens, see lower exposure to carcinogens. Don't get out much do you gkayser30? |
||||
|
|
Moderator |
So, we can put you down as: Ventilation works!? LOL When I was in high school I worked in a restaurant in the kitchen. They had those hoods. Went home every night caked in grease. Not really caked. Grease is too slippery a substance to use the word caked. Coated in grease. That's better. |
|||
|
What a lie! Tobacco smoke is one of the LEAST concentrated forms of pollution that people will be exposed to. |
||||
|
I will speak to my wife about that. Your posts are getting too silly for reply.goodbye. |
||||
|
Are you serious? Sucking smoke into your lungs isn't sucking polution into your lungs? I guess sitting down wind of a camp fire isn't likely to expose you to polution? I mean your burning pure organic wood aren't you? Petrol is derived from mineral oil which is organic so I guess car exhaust is OK? How about breathing the exhaust of a coal fired power station? Coal is organic, that can't be bad for you can it? Come on now, get a little real, the story of life doesn't start with "once upon a time" you know. Perhaps you could name some more concentrated polution that you suck into your lungs? The solid particles (the visible bit of the smoke) make up about 10 percent of tobacco smoke and include "tar" and nicotine. The gases or vapours make up about 90 percent of tobacco smoke. The major gas present is carbon monoxide (a valued gas by those wishing to commit suicide with car exhaust). Others include formaldehyde, acrolein, ammonia, nitrogen oxides, pyridine, hydrogen cyanide, vinyl chloride, N-nitrosodimethylamine, and acrylonitrile. from http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/ets_health.html |
||||
|
I'll tell you what. You spend 30 minutes in an enclosed garage with a running car. I'll spend the same 30 minutes in an enclosed garage filled to the brim with smokers, and I'll smoke too. The winner is the one who walks out after 30 minutes. You are an A$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ladyteal |
||||
|
Have you been to a restaurant lately? Did it have a huge range hood over each smoking table? While you claim I prove your point I guess you don't mind being one of the 50% of males or 13% of females with hearing loss? If a cook comes home covered in grease you prove ventilation doesn't work. It's called lowest acceptable risk, I won't go into the complexities of it here, your not capable in your present state of comprehending it but basically it is minimising risk and getting the job done. The hood lowers the risk so the job can get done with minimum risk. Now what occupation requires you to smoke to get the job done? I also never said everyone who has ever been exposed to cigarette smoke will die young but your risk of doing so is increased each drag you take. Now kick back and have another fag. |
||||
|
I don't think that a hood in a kitchen was ever meant to lower any kind of risk. It was designed to take the smell of cooking out of the building, and put it into the outside of the building. However, there are very good air filtration systems available to dissipate smoke. Unfortunately most establishments do not use these. ladyteal |
||||
|
Trying very hard to remember the last time I locked myself in a garage with a running car for 30 minutes ladyteal. Not many people expose themselves to that concentration of car exhaust ladyteal. Do you understand the concept of concentrated? You suck in pure undiluted tobacco smoke with each drag. That is the concentration we are talking about. Of course, if a person wanted to commit suicide, as I said earlier one might use carbon monoxide which is present in tobacco mainstream smoke at various levels depending on the cigarette and the smoker. Carbon monoxide is a by-product of incomplete combustion. In the old days a petrol car exhaust would test about 200ppm at idle but this figure is much lower for post catalytic converter models. (post 1986 in Australia) Cigarette smoke as it is inhaled has about 500ppm. http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/batco/html/5900/5951/index.html The cigarette number is from BATs own paper the car exhaust figure is from my personal experience during 16 years working as a mechanic using exhaust analysers to test vehicle emissions. |
||||
|
IKIA:
Does this mean you will not accept my challenge? ROFLMAO!  ladyteal |
||||
|
As I said do you know many people who subject themselves to that level of car exhaust 20 to 25 times a day.
My challenge to you is, I'll stand in that garage with the car running if you will only inhale through a lit full strength cigarette for the same 20 minutes. You must not inhale any air into your lungs that has not passed through a lit cigarette, last one standing can walk away from the challenge as fainting or dying will be considered whimping out. Of course you can use multiple cigarettes although I doubt you will outlast the first. OK have you got that? You only inhale through a lit cigarette and I stand in a closed garage with a car idling. You up for it? |
||||
|
I'm waiting
|
||||
|