Home    speakeasyforum.com    speakeasyforum.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Companies with Anti-smoking Policies    Law of Unintended Consequences
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
Law of Unintended Consequences

Imagine this scenerio.
A company with 100 employees decides to go smoke free.
The only way to identify the smokers is to use a drug test.
The only test for nicotine that I have heard of is only 95% accurate.

Let us say that 20% of the people smoke,the test will identify 19 of them.

Of the 80 nonsmokers,4 will have a false positive and be singled out,wrongly, for corrective action.

When the 4 falsely accused nonsmokers and their friends hear the 1 missed smoker ragging them about the stupid test, the company is going to have serious labor problems. Eek

It would be too much to hope for that one of the false positives would be the person that pushed for the nonsmoker policy. Big Grin

Gary K.
 
Posts: 832 | Registered: Fri September 09 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Good point Gary -- That hadn't occurred to me. Anytime you introduce testing, you introduce error. Oh what fun!
 
Posts: 29 | Registered: Mon April 23 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Home    speakeasyforum.com    speakeasyforum.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Companies with Anti-smoking Policies    Law of Unintended Consequences

Material presented in these forums constitute the views and opinions of the individual authors.