I stumbled across this researching something else thought I would share

Is The AIDS Virus Man-made?

Let’s suppose that in the past year you’ve gotten your flu shots largely because of a series of radio announcements from the Public Health Service about a new variety of Asian Flu. Then one day you stop by your church to make a blood donation during their annual blood drive, but they can’t accept your blood because the free HIV test reveals that you are HIV positive. You and your doctor are puzzled because you are in the low risk group because you are celibate, have never used intravenous drugs and have never had a blood transfusion. Sound Impossible?

Now imagine that you are Dr. "X" and head up a team at the U.S. Army’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Laboratory in Ft. Dietrick, Maryland, and under the direction of the CIA you’ve just finished five years of Top Secret reseearch on a virus for which man’s immune system has no defense and that you did all of the research at taxpayers expense through funding from the Department of Defense. Early field tests on prison convicts prove that the virus really works. The test subjects get sick and eventually die. Later on you link up with some "scientists" from the World Health Organization that have an interest in helping the project along with some larger field tests. In their Federation Proceedings they’ve already decided the best way to test the virus is to lace it into smallpox vaccines which are soon to be injected into selected test populations throughout the world. Central Africa is first on the list. Before long the test results come in. It works! Millions of people get sick and some are already starting to die. There is even a hidden bonus: people begin to spread it amonst themselves through promiscuous intercourse and intravenous drug injections. Now your real bosses, the Bilderberg Group, an allliance of elite rulers and international financiers. that fall under the umbrella of the Illuminati, are ecstatic. Perhaps now they will be able to reach their goal of reducing the worlds population by 75%.

Sound preposterous? This probably sounds like a science fiction plot for worldwide genocide to benefit the elite, but there is sufficient documentation to support just such a scenerio.

Much of the documentation supporting this idea came as a bonus in the 1983 to 1988 research of Dr. Robert Strecker, M.D., Ph.D., of Los Angeles who, along with his brother Ted, were hired to prepare a proposal for a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) for Security Pacific Bank of California on the long term effects of insuring and treating AIDS patients. At that time no one actually knew what the AIDS acturial data was, and the bank was responsible for insuring 30,000 employees, so the Strecker brothers went to the medical libraries and began reading for themselves what the cost of the this epedemic would be.

Not only did they discover that AIDS would bankrupt the nation’s medical system, but the also "unearthed thousands of documents supporting the man-made origin of AIDS." There for all the world to see was a request by top scientists who wrote in the 1972 World Health Organization Bulletin that there was a need to see if "viruses can, in fact, exert selective effects on the immune system..." They also said that "the possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself be impaired if the effective virus damage, more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens."

http://community-2.webtv.net/LikingLArry/IsTheAIDSVirusMan/

google House Bill 15090 showing that the U.S. government asked for the AIDS virus to be made.

Ummm.....may I suggest we leave "UFO" conspiracy stuff off of here? Especially ones in which the websites are done in black and purple?

Agreed that it is much more pleasant to read black writing on a white background with perhaps some purple decorations here and there -- if we must have purple. Though since we know the ETS fraud was also a man-made government- perpetrated invention, I'd say government in general has well-earned the clamor of widespread mistrust.

quote:

Originally posted by squeezer:
Ummm.....may I suggest we leave "UFO" conspiracy stuff off of here?

I've also seen similarly themed videos where the case is made that the AIDS virus doesn't really exist at all.

I hate to see conspiracy theories brought up in these discussions. First, because I think conspiracy theories miss the point. Second, because I think that the real explanations are much more interesting. Third, because there's no easier way to get the mainstream to dismiss your political views than by tying them to a conspiracy theory.

Anti-smoking is not a conspiracy, at least in any secretive sense. Anti-smoking is a one-size-fits-all, all-or-none, lowest-common-denominator message for the masses. Anti-smoking is a government public health message, and government public health caters to one guy and one guy only: the dumbest guy you ever met in your life.

When Public Health gets together at the table, the one thing that they're always trying to figure out is "How can we make sure that even the very least likely to get the message will get it?" For that order, anti-smoking and secondhand smoke fit the bill.

You'll notice that whenever anti-smoking does something draconian and assinine, there's always some government or special interest representative quoted in the news article saying they want to send "a clear message". "Clear message" really means "we want to get the attention of even the most feeble minded, so they're sure to know how little regard we really have for them."

Things like anti-smoking are driven by lawyers, politicians, government contractors and special interest groups. There usually aren't any Einsteins hanging around in these crowds, and such people tend to be utterly devoid of the imagination necessary to come up with any kind of elaborate conspiracy.

Rather, these people are really just serving their own self-interest, which is what people naturally tend to do. That is also why governments that coerce collectivism tend to not work, and tend to make themselves readily available to authoritarian dictators. Meanwhile governments that exploit this natural tendency for self-interest by emphasizing individual freedom, thrive.

Winston posted:

"Things like anti-smoking are driven by lawyers, politicians, government contractors and special interest groups. There usually aren't any Einsteins hanging around in these crowds, and such people tend to be utterly devoid of the imagination necessary to come up with any kind of elaborate conspiracy."

AMEN!!!
Gary K.