Note: All smoking related illnesses and deaths occur at age 70 or more.

There are almost 'NO' Zambians that live that long!!

Gary K.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-fact...korder/2102rank.html
Rank Order - Life expectancy at birth

221(of 223)..Zambia...38.59 years


http://forces.org/News_Portal/news_viewer.php?id=1198

Zambia

Zambia is the hardest-hit — actually ravaged — country by hunger and AIDS that the gangsters of the World Health Organization consider secondary to smoking.

So what health “threat” are the local “public health” criminals most concerned with -- to the point of imposing 2 years in jail for doing it on the streets?

Smoking, of course.

"The Zambian government has banned smoking in public places and those found wanting would be liable to pay a fine of 400,000 Kwachas (125.00US$)* or imprisonment for a term of up to two years. This is according to local government and housing minister Sylvia Masebo, who said she signed a Statutory Instrument that came into effect on May 27, 2008.

Average yearly income of a Zambian: US$380.00. Thus, for smoking a cigarette in public, Zambian antismoking criminals take 1/3 of the yearly income.

You're missing the point, Gary. It's FOR THE CHILDREN! They want them to make it to the big 4-0.

Personally, I don't see them collecting much on those fines. I think if the average Zambian had $125 laying around they'd move.

The antis would include smokers in the groups to let die.
Gary K.

http://www.northcountrygazette.org/2008/05/06/eugenics_american_style/

Eugenics American Style
Posted on Tuesday, 6 of May , 2008
The Associated Press reported on May 5, 2008 that an influential group of physicians has now recommended a sort of laundry-list of individuals who should not be given life-saving medical treatment, in the event of a pandemic.

Made up of medical intelligentsia, the Center for Disease Control and the Department of Homeland Security, this reporting body has fingered lives they now consider unworthy should the bottom drop out.

Clearly, the government has completely given up any façade of attempting to protect our liberties or personal privacy.

It would seem as though our own government is taking tremendous strides to own the lives, bodies and liberties of its citizenry through its brazen rewriting and indifference for our laws. And, though this report isn’t exactly a written law, its message is incredibly ominous.

The secondary presumption is that the government knows what’s best for you – irrespective of your own desires or needs.

This, after all, embodies losing control of your life at the hands of people who cannot even fix our roads.

The list of innocent individuals considered undeserving of medical assistance, compiled by this not-so-altruistic group of experts includes:


- People older than 85
- Severely burned patients
– over the age of 60
- Those with severe mental impairment – including Alzheimer’s disease
- Those with chronic disease

Any government-sanctioned study or reporting means that would single out certain types of people for care-rationing should raise apprehension in all citizens who value their lives and their privacy.

This is surely a injudicious and drunken step backwards into the eugenics the United States saw in the early 1900s and that the Third Reich embraced during their reign over Europe.

I loathe to think that our own government has turned against its citizenry – seeing us now as tics on the organism and not individual persons, living a free and unfettered life.

It would, indeed, seem that our own representative government has grown a deep-seated contempt for human beings they simply don’t see as fit anymore.